Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Linux 2.6.21 plans
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:17:59
Message-Id: pan.2007.04.27.16.47.07@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Linux 2.6.21 plans by Daniel Drake
1 Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> posted 46321019.9000207@g.o,
2 excerpted below, on Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:00:41 -0400:
3
4 > Duncan wrote:
5 >> I'm running (vanilla) rc7-git10 ATM, and have two possible regressions
6 >> remaining here
7 >
8 > If reproducible on gentoo-soures-2.6.21, please file bug reports for
9 > them or they will get lost.
10
11 Ugh. I hate it when I so publicly mis-type! =8^( It was 2.6.21-rc7-
12 git8, not git10. Anyway, the X restore thing was (apparently) fixed
13 since git4, but the clock thing's still an issue. I still have to
14 eliminate a couple more things on my end, however, before bugging it.
15
16 --
17 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
18 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
19 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list