Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] boost-utils.eclass -- for building against newest boost.
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:36:17
Message-Id: CAJ0EP40aRzSSzVdxk+Zg9WTih4Mqq+Zw4f==S0tQeeamXBTU6Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] boost-utils.eclass -- for building against newest boost. by "Michał Górny"
1 On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:26:02 +0200
3 > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >
5 >> 2012-08-28 00:19:28 Michał Górny napisał(a):
6 >> > --- /dev/null
7 >> > +++ b/gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass
8 >> > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
9 >> > +# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
10 >> > +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
11 >> > +# $Header: $
12 >> > +
13 >> > +if [[ ! ${_BOOST_ECLASS} ]]; then
14 >> > +
15 >> > +# @ECLASS: boost-utils.eclass
16 >> > +# @MAINTAINER:
17 >> > +# mgorny@g.o
18 >>
19 >> It is better to copy list of maintainers from
20 >> gentoo-x86/dev-libs/boost/metadata.xml.
21 >>
22 >> > +# @BLURB: helper functions for packages using Boost C++ library
23 >> > +# @DESCRIPTION:
24 >> > +# Helper functions to be used when building packages using the
25 >> > Boost C++ +# library collection.
26 >> > +
27 >> > +case ${EAPI:-0} in
28 >> > + 0|1|2|3|4) ;;
29 >> > + *) die "${ECLASS}.eclass API in EAPI ${EAPI} not yet
30 >> > established." +esac
31 >>
32 >> Please accept all EAPIs.
33 >
34 > These are EAPIs which are allowed throughout the tree, sorry. Feel free
35 > to ping Council about adding non-standard EAPIs to eclasses.
36 >
37
38 Is the eclass likely to be incompatible with future EAPIs? If not, I
39 think it is reasonable to remove this check.

Replies