Archives
Archives
| From: | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:14:26 | ||
| Message-Id: | 2fd3bbae-0fa0-d65e-dae4-874db95c1688@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On 24/02/16 01:33, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 | > That option is there, and indeed, a patch providing it was specifically |
| 3 | > added to portage for infra to use, because appending entries to existing |
| 4 | > files is vastly easier and more performant than trying to prepend entries |
| 5 | > and having to rewrite the entire file as a result. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | This sounds wrong in many different ways. The changelog files are tiny |
| 8 | and makes next to no difference truncate+write or append. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | lu |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed? | Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed? | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed? | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |