| 1 |
foser wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 10:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>either you have a policy of cutting unmaintained packages or you dont ... you |
| 5 |
>>cant have some vague middle ground |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Hide behind policy if you can't do it with common sense. The policy is |
| 9 |
> to add valid metadata.xml data to packages that do not have it, that has |
| 10 |
> not been done here. Adding 'maintainer-needed' (or 'no-herd') as a way |
| 11 |
> out is not sufficient and was never intended policy when metadata/herds |
| 12 |
> got introduced. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> - foser |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If no one has an objection, I'll pick up that package, I think it is fun, never |
| 17 |
tought I'd use it, but I have so much code written I'd like how much I have |
| 18 |
really done. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
If there is no objection I'll make the update needed, create metadata, make |
| 21 |
repoman happy. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Phil |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives