From: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue | ||
Date: | Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:01:59 | ||
Message-Id: | 1339095641.3014.26.camel@belkin4 | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue by Ciaran McCreesh |
1 | El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 19:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: |
2 | > On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:43:54 +0200 |
3 | > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
4 | > > > I would prefer, as a workaround, allow reverse deps to RDEPEND on |
5 | > > > glib:2.* instead. That way it would cover more cases when more than |
6 | > > > two slots are available |
7 | > > |
8 | > > Well, per: |
9 | > > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commitdiff;h=f9f7729c047300e1924ad768a49c660e12c2f906;hp=b7750e67b4772c1064543defb7df6a556f09807b |
10 | > > |
11 | > > looks like "*" usage for SLOTs would be allowed :), or I am |
12 | > > misinterpreting it? |
13 | > |
14 | > It's not a wildcard. |
15 | > |
16 | |
17 | But it looks like a valid usage for cases like glib vs. |
18 | dbus-glib/gobject-introspection I have exposed as example, and also |
19 | allows us to keep "SLOT" over "ABI_SLOT" (at least for this case, not |
20 | sure about others I could be missing now...) |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> |