| 1 |
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 22:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> > There is a difference between using package.mask and ~arch for |
| 3 |
> > ebuilds. The use of ~arch denotes an ebuild requires testing. The use |
| 4 |
> > of package.mask denotes that the application or library itself is |
| 5 |
> > deemed unstable. |
| 6 |
> | Second: a) and b) doesn't match what's going on with large parts of |
| 7 |
> | the tree |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Good time for package maintainers to start following policy properly, |
| 10 |
> eh? |
| 11 |
Good time for policy to be adapted to match reality ;-) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move |
Archives