| 1 |
On 7/10/06, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > c is simpler. I like it. |
| 5 |
> > Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to |
| 6 |
> > <herd> tag and assigning to that even when a particular maintainer is listed. |
| 7 |
> Actually, this isn't that simple at the moment. There are packages that |
| 8 |
> directly list me as the maintainer, but I want bugs for them assigned to |
| 9 |
> the herd by default - so that the other folk in the herd can find them |
| 10 |
> quickly. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Perhaps this could be alleviated with an explicit assign-to field in |
| 13 |
> package metadata? At the same time, it should have an explicit cc-to |
| 14 |
> field, for cases where the maintainer is not in the herd. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
My idea would actually be the contrary: that the package is assigned |
| 17 |
to its maintainer (who could not be in the herd) and the herd(s) are |
| 18 |
CCed. Uven if the maintainer is in the herd, this procedure should be |
| 19 |
followed, as it is easier for the maintainer to track down the |
| 20 |
package. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Ioannis Aslanidis |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
<deathwing00[at]gentoo.org> 0xB9B11F4E |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives