1 |
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 10:44 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:22 +0000, Edward Catmur wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:40 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote: |
5 |
> > > > And one more thing. For proper debugging, don't I need the source to be |
6 |
> > > > present ? |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > -g3 -ggdb embeds the source code in the debug info so I don't see the |
9 |
> > > point. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > It doesn't; at least not with gcc 3.4.4. It does embed function |
12 |
> > prototypes and macro definitions, though. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Ed Catmur |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Eh? |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
Never mind you were right Ed. taviso pointed out that dwarf2 doesnt |
20 |
support embedding the actual source. I was seeing the source due to me |
21 |
not having deleted the source. |
22 |
|
23 |
Guess that is where the debugedit thing of Tester's would come in handy |
24 |
on glibc hosts. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
29 |
Gentoo Linux |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |