| 1 |
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:32:22 -0600 |
| 2 |
Nathan Zachary <nathanzachary@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 09/03/10 22:08, Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Hello! |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > We have about 500 bump request open at the moment: |
| 9 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=bump |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > I assume that quite a few of them would be no big deal to their |
| 12 |
> > maintainers in Gentoo. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Bugday is occupying the first Saturday of the month: how about bumpday |
| 16 |
> > on the third Saturday of the month? First bumpday could be March 20th, |
| 17 |
> > 10 days from now. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > What do you think? |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > Sebastian |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> Not sure that my opinion matters all that much as I'm not currently |
| 27 |
> doing ebuild work, but I think this idea could really help out the |
| 28 |
> status of the tree. Attached to it could be a stabilisation day as well. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> --Nathan Zachary |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
The ones that I'm CCed on, either as proxy maintainer or because I have some other interest, I prolly would mind. They're not simple revbumps, but they have dependency changes and/or other complicated changes, which is the only reason why they're still open. My bugs can't be solved with a simple rename-and-commit. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I'm prolly not the only one who feels this way, so you really need to pick your bugs carefully! Otherwise we'll end up with another screwed-up mess like the one we just went through with patrick. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Bumpdays are otherwise a good idea, though I'm not sure why we need a separate day for that in addition to our standard bugdays. |
Archives