| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:17 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti: |
| 4 |
>>> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 23:34 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> Then we require this file to be updated |
| 6 |
>>>> monthly. What do you think? |
| 7 |
>>> I think Release Engineering would kill you in our off time. This has |
| 8 |
>>> been brought up before, but some projects just don't have enough going |
| 9 |
>>> on to update on a regular cycle. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>> So you just change the date? I don't think we should require anything |
| 12 |
>> but acknowledgment that the old data still applies. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> So turn it into one more mundane and pointless task that I am forced to |
| 15 |
> perform simply because it is a matter of policy? Having to go around |
| 16 |
> saying "yes, this is still correct" is rather wasteful, is it not? I |
| 17 |
> know I would have to do this for several projects, all of which are not |
| 18 |
> the sort to really have updates to publish. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Seems like a reasonable idea. So many of our webpages are out of date |
| 21 |
that asking people to check any pages they "maintain" (where's our |
| 22 |
metadata.xml?) whether they're still current once in a while might work. |
| 23 |
Adding extra busywork to this by documenting it may not be worthwhile. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks, |
| 26 |
Donnie |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives