| 1 |
On 7/24/13 8:31 AM, Alex Alexander wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:15:51AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Actually, Portage normally handles this situation gracefully by using |
| 4 |
>> the dependencies from the portage tree instead of vdb. However, in the |
| 5 |
>> case of a slot-operator dep, it always uses vdb. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> See bug 477544. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Aha, thanks for the bug, missed it. Well, my recommendation is still |
| 12 |
> valid until portage gets fixed. Glad to know someone's looking into |
| 13 |
> it though. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Can we get that recommendation to the devmanual possibly? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I'm still a little bit confused what exactly would warrant such a |
| 18 |
revision bump, and why. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Paweł |
Archives