| 1 |
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 07:44:34PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:14, Harald van Dijk wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Gentoo's gcc with the vanilla flag isn't the official GCC. Most patches |
| 4 |
> > don't get appplied, but some do. Plus, gcc[vanilla] isn't a supported |
| 5 |
> > compiler in Gentoo. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> you're just griping because i forced ssp/pie regardless of USE=vanilla ... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I didn't mind that you applied ssp/pie patches regardless of |
| 10 |
USE=vanilla, I did mind that you applied the stub patches with |
| 11 |
USE="nossp vanilla", and I also didn't like that this was either done |
| 12 |
accidentally but ignored when pointed out, or that this was done |
| 13 |
deliberately with a misleading cvs log message. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> since gcc-4.0 and below are on the way out, i have no problem changing this |
| 16 |
> behavior |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> besides, since both of these technologies are in mainline gcc now, i really |
| 19 |
> dont see how you can continue to gripe with gcc-4.1.1+ |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I don't know how much gcc-spec-env.patch can be trusted, and even if it |
| 22 |
is 100% safe, such patches don't belong in anything that would be called |
| 23 |
"vanilla". (I have commented on that patch long before this thread |
| 24 |
started, so don't think I'm just looking for something to complain about |
| 25 |
now.) |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives