| 1 |
On Monday, 8. April 2002 11:54, you wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Euhm... |
| 5 |
> These benchmarks of spider were compile times? :o) |
| 6 |
> Damn.. I still don't know wether i will have a faster system with gcc |
| 7 |
> 3.x than i had with gcc 2.95.x... please tell me: |
| 8 |
> Is gcc 3.x faster than 2.95 during RUNTIME and execution of the |
| 9 |
> program? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
the german magazin ix ( http://www.heise.de/ix/ ) did some benchmarks |
| 12 |
(spec) on gcc 3.0 and gcc 2.95.3 which showed that gcc3.0 was faster - |
| 13 |
but not by much |
| 14 |
in some cases (bzip) it was slower! |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
but then, i don't remember if they bootstrapped the compiler.... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Thanks! :o) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
regards |
| 23 |
Thilo |
Archives