Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Using stow inside portage | ||
| Date: | Sun, 18 Jul 2004 06:28:37 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200407180228.41251.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Using stow inside portage by Chris Frey |
||
| 1 | On Sunday 18 July 2004 02:23 am, Chris Frey wrote: |
| 2 | > I'm sure there are ebuilds that don't rely completely on econf() and |
| 3 | > friends, and these would be harder to update. Is there anything else |
| 4 | > I'm missing? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | why bloat econf ? |
| 7 | an eclass sounds better ... `stow-eclass` ... |
| 8 | |
| 9 | then again i know nothing of stow except for what i've read in your e-mail :) |
| 10 | -mike |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |