| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
>> Should arch testers start working with 4.1.1 then? And do you want bugs to |
| 5 |
>> block #117482? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Arch testers should contact their architecture's leads or Release |
| 8 |
> Engineering Architecture Coordinator. As for bug reports, yes. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Just an update - I've finished most major desktop stuff for x86 without any |
| 11 |
problems. I'm moving onto stuff that's already on the tracker and is fixed in |
| 12 |
testing but not stable. Rather than open and track a ton of new bugs, I'd like |
| 13 |
to reopen the original ~arch bugs and request a backport or stabilization at the |
| 14 |
maintainer's discretion. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Is this okay, or would people rather get a shiny new bug? Keep in mind there |
| 17 |
are already 290 bugs on the tracker. Alternatively, would it be better to just |
| 18 |
start a new tracker bug for stabilization? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117482 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
--de. |
Archives