Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] More on portage 2.0.50
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 02:16:08
Message-Id: 200402062116.01881.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] More on portage 2.0.50 by Ferris McCormick
1 On Friday 06 February 2004 08:44 pm, Ferris McCormick wrote:
2 > When you force a corresponding upgrade to gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre5,
3 > etcat becomes broken:
4
5 this is known and i dont believe there are plans to fix it ... use equery
6 since it's going to replace etcat/qpkg
7
8 > Now, as previously reported, REALLY BAD:
9 > ==========
10 > unlink: /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage.pyc
11 > open_wr: /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage.pyc
12 > unlink: /usr/lib/portage/pym/xpak.pyc
13 > open_wr: /usr/lib/portage/pym/xpak.pyc
14 > unlink: /usr/lib/portage/pym/cvstree.pyc
15 > open_wr: /usr/lib/portage/pym/cvstree.pyc
16 > unlink: /usr/lib/portage/pym/getbinpkg.pyc
17 > open_wr: /usr/lib/portage/pym/getbinpkg.pyc
18 > unlink: /usr/lib/portage/pym/output.pyc
19 > open_wr: /usr/lib/portage/pym/output.pyc
20 > unlink: /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage_db_cpickle.pyc
21 > open_wr: /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage_db_cpickle.pyc
22 > unlink: /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage_db_template.pyc
23 > open_wr: /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage_db_template.pyc
24 > unlink: /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage_db_flat.pyc
25 > open_wr: /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage_db_flat.pyc
26
27 did you look in bugzilla ? i remember seeing these things before and i kind
28 of remember them being arch-specific, but i also remember them being
29 fixed ...
30 -mike

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] More on portage 2.0.50 Ferris McCormick <fmccor@××××××××.com>