| 1 |
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:43:28 +0200 |
| 2 |
Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> since the last time I asked Zac about this it came back to bite me[1] |
| 5 |
> this time I'm going to send the announce to the list first, and if |
| 6 |
> nobody can actually come up with a good reason not to, I'm going to ask |
| 7 |
> Zac tomorrow to re-enable the feature. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
"Tomorrow" isn't much of a warning. Can you please give people a chance to |
| 10 |
fix the bugs you've filed? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Something I forgot to ask before: are the 'always overflow' warnings new w/ |
| 13 |
GCC 4.5 / glibc 2.12? If they're new w/ 4.5 then we don't have a problem. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
fonts, gcc-porting, we hold our breath, we spin around the world |
| 18 |
toolchain, wxwidgets you and me cling to the outside of the earth |
| 19 |
@ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives