Archives
Archives
| From: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: ros-catkin.eclass, new USE_EXPAND: ROS_MESSAGES, new categories: dev-ros and ros-meta for review. | ||
| Date: | Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:18:06 | ||
| Message-Id: | 55FBD6BF.2000407@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: ros-catkin.eclass, new USE_EXPAND: ROS_MESSAGES, new categories: dev-ros and ros-meta for review. by hasufell |
||
| 1 | On 09/18/2015 11:10 AM, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 | > On 09/18/2015 11:06 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 3 | >>> |
| 4 | >>> eclasses (and ebuilds) are always bash in gentoo and I'd vote for |
| 5 | >>> writing "true" bash code, to stay consistent |
| 6 | >>> |
| 7 | >> |
| 8 | >> it is "true" bash :) |
| 9 | >> |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > No, it's compatibility mode. See bash manpage under "Compound Commands". |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Anyway, both works, so there's no reason to debate a lot over this. |