| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
30.08.14 04:41, Rich Freeman написав(ла): |
| 4 |
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki <jauhien@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> Hi all, |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I have a simple question: why do we have systemd subprofiles only in gnome and kde profiles? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Could we add systemd subprofiles also to default/linux/$arch/13.0/ and desktop (and any other profiles where it makes sense)? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I'm not sure systemd profiles actually make that much sense these |
| 12 |
> days. To install systemd from a stage3 you basically just need to set |
| 13 |
> USE=systemd and do an emerge -uDN world. We're actually getting close |
| 14 |
> to the point where you would pick an init system the way you pick a |
| 15 |
> kernel or cron implementation during install. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> -- |
| 18 |
> Rich |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
that's good. Then I have another question: why systemd profile exists at all? As I see as consistent two possibilities: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
1. no systemd profiles at all |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
2. systemd subprofile profile of default exists together with other profiles |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
--- |
| 28 |
Jauhien |
Archives