| 1 |
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> - net-misc/ntp: "as-is" looks fine as main license, although some |
| 3 |
> parts of the code are under different licenses like GPL (but I |
| 4 |
> haven't checked in detail what gets installed). |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Uh, if we're distributing the sources, and they contain GPL content, |
| 7 |
then the only valid answer is GPL, or nomirror. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> While the above are at least free software (mostly BSD/MIT like), |
| 10 |
> I think that as-is is completely wrong for the following: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> - app-admin/passook: Seems to have no license at all. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> - net-wireless/zd1201-firmware: No license in tarball or on homepage. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> - net-wireless/prism54-firmware: Ditto, and package is mirror |
| 17 |
> restricted. (How can it be on our install media then?) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
No license, no distribution, unless there is a declaration that it is |
| 21 |
in the public domain, in which case that is the "license." |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Thanks for checking! |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Rich |
Archives