| 1 |
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 06:31, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 30 January 2006 20:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > 1. Because for things like LINGUAS, there are arbitrarily many legal |
| 4 |
> > values, and documenting them all and keeping the list up to date would |
| 5 |
> > be extremely difficult. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> "More precisely, how should they be documented if not via use.desc?" |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
considering there's a ton more LINGUAS values than we have USE flags (just run |
| 10 |
`wc` on use.desc and lang.desc), bloating use.desc with LINGUAS settings |
| 11 |
benefits *noone* |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
we have lang.desc, it is quite populated, what's wrong with having portage |
| 14 |
read that |
| 15 |
-mike |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives