| 1 |
On Saturday 07 August 2004 01:57, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I, too, am working on a portage-ng. It's called portage. Presently, I'm |
| 4 |
> near finishing a new dependency resolver that supports: |
| 5 |
> * Ranged deps |
| 6 |
> * USE-based atoms |
| 7 |
> * SLOT-based atoms |
| 8 |
> * SLOT upgrades |
| 9 |
> * Full circular dependency support |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Even with all that, a full dependency tree is built with all circular |
| 12 |
> dependencies resolved in about 6 seconds, where currently emerge takes |
| 13 |
> about 2 seconds. I can't see a way to get USE-based SLOTs in without at |
| 14 |
> least doubling that figure (which is incidentally the time that 2.0.50 |
| 15 |
> took). I'm open to suggestions on how to get around it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I don't have a dependency resolver at all yet (I've been working on the |
| 18 |
general architecture and parsing of ebuilds. I'll be happy to help out where |
| 19 |
I can. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Paul |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 25 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 26 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 27 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives