| 1 |
Read the log before commenting. Along with the email containing the log |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
It explains what occurred fairly well, oddly enough. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On 11/18/05, Corey Shields <cshields@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> On Friday 18 November 2005 08:31 pm, Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 7 |
> > No, thats not entirely true. It was submitted a few months ago and taken |
| 8 |
> > to the council where it was rejected and asked to be revised. When the |
| 9 |
> > council asked for things to put on their agenda for this latest meeting, |
| 10 |
> > it was asked that this GLEP be voted upon again. At this point, the |
| 11 |
> > revised version had yet to be shown on -dev for discussion. It wasn't |
| 12 |
> > until a day before the vote that it was sent to -dev for discussion. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > I just wanted to get the facts straight :-) (at least from how I know). |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Ahh, ok thanks for clearing that up. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Still screwed up. Lesson learned, make friends with a majority of the |
| 19 |
> council, write and propose a glep the day before a meeting and then push it |
| 20 |
> through. wow. sounds a lot like American politics. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> -- |
| 23 |
> Corey Shields |
| 24 |
> Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team |
| 25 |
> Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
| 26 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
| 27 |
> -- |
| 28 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives