| 1 |
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 14:11 +0000, LostSon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 23 March 2005 05:10 pm, Aron Griffis wrote: |
| 3 |
> > LostSon wrote: [Tue Mar 22 2005, 07:44:38PM EST] |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > > This had been brought to my attention earlier and my laptop's time |
| 6 |
> and |
| 7 |
> > > date is set right. Unfortunately this doesnt help either. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37958 |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > -- |
| 12 |
> > Aron Griffis |
| 13 |
> > Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> -- |
| 16 |
> Ok i read through that bug and have followed its suggestions |
| 17 |
> recompiled my |
| 18 |
> gcc. Made sure my time was correct and its still looping away. Maybe |
| 19 |
> its just |
| 20 |
> time for a fresh install or something. I have to have my laptop in |
| 21 |
> good |
| 22 |
> working order. Seriously discouraged. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Not very scientific, but try: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
$ touch foo; find / -newer foo |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
maybe its not a header from gcc that is newer ? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 34 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 35 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives