| 1 |
On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:00:00 -0400 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > i dont see why this is required ? ignoring the fact that the |
| 8 |
> > > > wording is way too vague to do anything but cause confusion and |
| 9 |
> > > > people to spout long winded rants, seems like useless nitpicking |
| 10 |
> > > > about an issue that doesnt exist |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > Well, I believe one hypothetical situation which it would address |
| 13 |
> > > would be something like this: |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > blow your conspiracy theories somewhere else |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Hm? Like I said, it was a hypothetical situation. I'm not suggesting |
| 18 |
> that anything like that has ever happened, merely that Christel's idea |
| 19 |
> of protecting Gentoo from that kind of thing in the future isn't a bad |
| 20 |
> thing... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
well, while we're protecting Gentoo from hypothetical situations that dont |
| 23 |
exist now but could in the future, we should add a clause that bans collusion |
| 24 |
with Lucifer as that would of course give us a bad rep |
| 25 |
-mike |
Archives