Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alex Xu <alex_y_xu@×××××.ca>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving more arches to dev profiles
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:58:38
Message-Id: 5214F1B4.70006@yahoo.ca
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving more arches to dev profiles by Michael Palimaka
1 On 21/08/13 12:23 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
2 >> Imho the situation is that agos intensive work displaced all the other
3 >> ones, or they at least rely on ago doing the work and loose focus.
4 >>
5 > At one point before Ago came along, stabilisation of Qt was taking so
6 > long we had to start masking reverse dependencies for minor archs, so
7 > please don't blame Ago.
8
9 I believe the point that xmw was trying to make was that ago is doing
10 *too good* of a job, not too poor of a job.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature