1 |
I can understand the need to reduce meaningless spams on the dev list, |
2 |
but seems like general rejection of posts from non-developers would |
3 |
distract the idea of this being an open mailing list: a list that one can’t |
4 |
post to effectively decays to something like a bulletin board, and obviously |
5 |
the developing process shouldn’t be kept in a showcase, which would greatly |
6 |
discourage people who are not part of the dev team, yet still wanting to |
7 |
get involved in the discussing, maybe even decision-making. |
8 |
|
9 |
Pengcheng Xu |
10 |
i@××××××××.moe |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
> H30/03/20 20:17、Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>のメール: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I see that in bug #650964[1] Council is pushing forward again with |
17 |
> implementing user whitelisting on this mailing list (ie. anyone that is |
18 |
> not "approved" will have their mail rejected). |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Could someone please explain how this doesn't directly contradict the |
21 |
> core tenets of an open and inclusive community? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> 1: https://bugs.gentoo.org/650964 |
24 |
> |