1 |
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Thomas Beaudry wrote: |
2 |
> Maybe I could have phrased that a little better. The message |
3 |
> I was replying to talked about not wanting it in Gentoo because |
4 |
> he dislikes it and always shuts it off in Mandrake. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I was just saying that that is selfish, to deny others a feature |
7 |
> just so he doesn't have to be bothered with a few minutes time |
8 |
> to get rid of it. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> In otherwords, I was responding in the context he created. |
11 |
|
12 |
I must appologize; In large part my response was targeted at the wording, |
13 |
even though I was pretty certain that you hadn't meant it that way, and |
14 |
I'm sorry to have put you between the sights, so to speak. |
15 |
|
16 |
I've just seen people who honestly felt that they were doing people a |
17 |
favour by blindly adding new features that are 'opt-out', when the only |
18 |
real excuse for that model of improvement is to 'make it easier for the |
19 |
newbies'; a fact which has the inverse effect of making it harder for the |
20 |
more discerning users. e.g. you _can_ disable the majority of the |
21 |
automation cruft that SuSE installs without breaking their system, but in |
22 |
general it is more of a pain in the neck than it is worth. |
23 |
|
24 |
> Of course if a menu ebuild is implemented, it would be an op-in |
25 |
> just like every other ebuild under Gentoo. I didn't think it |
26 |
> was necessary to point out the obvious. Guess I was wrong. |
27 |
|
28 |
You will have to excuse me.. I've been overlooking the obvious all day |
29 |
long. I think I need to get some more sleep. =) |
30 |
|
31 |
--James |