| 1 |
On 06/08/2016 02:40 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:50:05 -0400 |
| 3 |
> NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> From what I've seen, HACKING is a fairly common doc in FOSS projects. |
| 6 |
>> It doesn't seem to have been included in the default DOCS for |
| 7 |
>> einstalldocs in EAPI6. While going through the MATE packages, I noticed |
| 8 |
>> that we have quite a few packages that include HACKING in DOCS, so I |
| 9 |
>> cannot delete the DOCS array and take advantage of the automagic doc |
| 10 |
>> detection feature of einstalldocs. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> Does anyone know why we omitted this file from the default DOCS? A |
| 13 |
>> quick grep of the main repo shows ~370 ebuilds with HACKING listed. Is |
| 14 |
>> this file no longer considered worthy of being included by default in |
| 15 |
>> our installed docs? If so, looking for advice on whether it is worth |
| 16 |
>> keeping or dropping that file from my packages? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> File a Future EAPI bug asking to include it in EAPI 7. I don't see |
| 19 |
> a reason to omit it by default. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Done. Thanks for the suggestion. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585428 in case anyone is interested. |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
NP-Hardass |
Archives