| 1 |
Mikael Hallendal wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>tis 2001-10-02 klockan 08.40 skrev Daniel Robbins: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>Hi devs, |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>I just added a new pre-release version of Portage to gentoo-src (developers |
| 8 |
>>only) CVS that allows you to use USE variables in the SRC_URI as follows: |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>>SRC_URI="foo? ( http://www.foo.bar/meep.tar.gz )" |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>>We will gradually start using these features. But right now I need testers. |
| 13 |
>>If MAINTAINER is set to "yes", then all the USE variables in the SRC_URI will |
| 14 |
>>default to "on", so that maintainers will be forced to test all SRC_URIs and |
| 15 |
>>also cause complete digests to be generated. You can also use the new "!foo?" |
| 16 |
>>syntax in SRC_URIs and soon in DEPENDS and RDEPENDS as well. This new version |
| 17 |
>>of Portage also adds archive size to the digest files and uses a new file-based |
| 18 |
>>DEPEND and RDEPEND passing method (for behind-the-scenes bash <-> python |
| 19 |
>>integration.) |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
>Hi! |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
>This is great! |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
>Both foo? in SRC_URI and !foo? is both really needed. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
>Regards, |
| 29 |
> Mikael Hallendal |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
You could do it like this too: |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
use foo && SRC_URI="$SRC_URI http://domain/project-foo-patch.tbz2" |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Although the !foo? is problably nicer. Just another way to do it until |
| 36 |
the !foo? way is finished. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Also that'd work with my used flags patch until it's integrated into the |
| 39 |
rest of portage. ;) |
Archives