1 |
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, everyone. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I'd like to just make a short announcement that I've updated |
5 |
> the developer commit timeline [1]. Besides the usual periodic update, |
6 |
> there are two major changes: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> a. I've added commit counts to the bars (in the popups shown upon |
9 |
> hovering the bar), |
10 |
|
11 |
Can you make the commit counts always display instead of |
12 |
only displaying when you hover the mouse over something? |
13 |
|
14 |
Thanks, |
15 |
|
16 |
William |
17 |
|
18 |
> |
19 |
> b. I've created an additional timeline for determining activity of |
20 |
> active Gentoo developers, as a partial replacement for the semi-broken |
21 |
> 'slacker' script used by Undertakers [2]. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Quick rehash for those who don't know the pages: those timelines |
25 |
> present the commit activity of current and past Gentoo developers based |
26 |
> on gentoo.git (with CVS history grafted). The bars represent adjacent |
27 |
> periods of activity, and are interrupted when a developer hadn't |
28 |
> committed for a period 3 months. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> The timeline for historical devs [1] is ordered by the earliest commit, |
31 |
> so should roughly represent the order in which developers joined. Note |
32 |
> that in case of developers who used to be proxied maintainers, |
33 |
> the earlier p-m commits are also counted if their respective e-mail |
34 |
> matches. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> The timeline for active devs [2] is order by the latest commit, so |
37 |
> should roughly start with developers who are inactive the longest. It |
38 |
> only lists developers who have commit access to gentoo.git. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
> [1]:https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/dev-timeline.html |
42 |
> [2]:https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/active-devs.html |
43 |
> |
44 |
> -- |
45 |
> Best regards, |
46 |
> Michał Górny |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |