Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 15:00:45
Message-Id: CAJ0EP40y9sF1f+8_rHLDqCHdsbYhsyD2Vh9vLieATCj4G1XdzA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests by Jeroen Roovers
1 On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
2 > Perhaps it's a good idea to add a section to the devmanual about adding
3 > new keywords to packages.
4 >
5 > Recruits in particular might benefit from some background on what
6 > keywording means and when it should be done, especially before they
7 > start maintaining packages and then realise their packages are so
8 > beautiful that they positively *deserve* to have some random keywords
9 > added. This is not productive.
10 >
11 > The way it works is that users of
12 > specific architectures find that a package works for them on their
13 > systems (which have enough resources and have the correct interfaces for
14 > that particular program to be used conveniently, and so on), and that
15 > they then request that their architecture keyword be added. What
16 > doesn't work is having a handful of keywords on a package that nobody
17 > cares about who actually uses the architectures in question.
18 >
19 > Since over the years the Random Keyword Requests happen a *lot* right
20 > after recruitment, it might even be useful to ask about this in the
21 > quizzes. (The answer: your time is better spent fixing actual bugs.
22 > bumping versions, adding features and maintaining a stable branch,
23 > rather than raising the architecture count for your packages for no
24 > adequately explored reason.)
25 >
26 >
27 > Kind regards,
28 > jer
29 >
30
31 Both ideas (devmanual update + quiz question) seem good to me.