1 |
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 10:07:07 +0300, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Hi all! |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I'm going to revive RDMA fabric related things in gentoo. And since its not |
6 |
|
7 |
Yay! |
8 |
|
9 |
> only about infiniband staff but about more generic fabric types there is and |
10 |
> idea to rename category sys-infiniband to more generic name. Suggestions are |
11 |
> |
12 |
> sys-rdma |
13 |
> sys-fabric |
14 |
> |
15 |
> What will be inside? It will be RDMA related stuff like OFED, fabric userspace |
16 |
> drivers (verbs, psm, psm2, libfabric and others), plugins for specific devices, |
17 |
> tools to flash RDMA cards and other related staff. |
18 |
|
19 |
This makes me happy. I've been playing with a standalone libfabric in my |
20 |
overlay via the sockets/UDP providers, and had nothing but problems when I |
21 |
tried to add USE flags for the various OFED bits (psm2 etc.) |
22 |
|
23 |
An up-to-date libfabric that pulls in ofed only when needed would finally enable |
24 |
people without the otherwise necessary fabric HW to write against the much more |
25 |
usable & sane (when compared to raw IB verbs) libfabric APIs. |
26 |
|
27 |
As far as the name is concerned IMHO fabric sounds less RDMA-specific; |
28 |
I think the OFI WG now also prefers implementation-neutral terms. |
29 |
|
30 |
cheers, |
31 |
Holger |