1 |
On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 06:38, Chris PeBenito wrote: |
2 |
> etc. I don't know which one would be chosen if you type "emerge |
3 |
> firebird". |
4 |
|
5 |
That is one of the reasons why net-www/firebird would be a bad choice. |
6 |
Currently, it is ambigious which one would be chosen. |
7 |
|
8 |
> net-www/firebird"). Naming it MozillaFirebird would be a violation of |
9 |
> Gentoo's development policy because of the capitalization |
10 |
> (mozillafirebird or mozilla-firebird would be ok). |
11 |
|
12 |
Indeed, capitialisation is frowned upon for a package name in portage. I |
13 |
support it being called mozilla-firebird or even mozilla-browser as it |
14 |
will be renamed to after 1.4[1]. However, I'm not the maintainer of |
15 |
phoenix or mozilla, so it is ultimately up to them. |
16 |
|
17 |
I have no comment about -bin and -cvs. I don't personally use phoenix so |
18 |
I'm not sure why we have those compared with the regular source release. |
19 |
|
20 |
Cheers, |
21 |
|
22 |
Alastair |
23 |
|
24 |
[1] http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap/branding.html |
25 |
"When referring to Thunderbird or Firebird before or during the 1.4 |
26 |
release cycle, make sure to use the project name with Mozilla pre-pended |
27 |
as "Mozilla Thunderbird" or "Mozilla Firebird" instead of Mozilla alone |
28 |
or Firebird/Thunderbird alone. ... Use the names "Mozilla Browser" and |
29 |
"Mozilla Mail" to describe the Firebird and Thunderbird projects after |
30 |
the 1.4 release." |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Alastair 'liquidx' Tse |
34 |
>> Gentoo Developer |
35 |
>> http://www.liquidx.net/ | http://cvs.gentoo.org/~liquidx/ |
36 |
>> GPG Key : http://cvs.gentoo.org/~liquidx/liquidx_gentoo_org.asc |
37 |
>> FingerPrint : 579A 9B0E 43E8 0E40 EE93 BB1C 38CE 1C7B 3907 14F6 |