Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: rindeal <dev.rindeal@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, qa@g.o, council@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 17:28:59
Message-Id: CANgLvuC-_xdQcig=z6oj2xm6VYPj4rCdcSZydN3S9tV3E=Lcnw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation by William Hubbs
1 > (qa hat in place)
2 >
3 > There is a qa policy about this. All packages in the tree should
4 > move away from the non-versioned gtk use flag to versioned use flags,
5 > like the ones the qt team uses [1] [2].
6 >
7 > This seems to be the best compromise. It allows the maintainers of the
8 > packages to decide which toolkit they want to support. If there is too
9 > much work involved in maintaining a package with dual support, don't do
10 > the work, just make it support the appropriate toolkit version.
11 >
12 > I have not seen any reason why something like this couldn't work. After
13 > all, it seems to work for the qt team.
14 >
15 > William
16 >
17 > [1]
18 > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Policies#gtk.2Fgtk2.2Fgtk3_USE_flag_situation
19 > [2]
20 > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Meeting_Summaries#GTK_flag_situation
21
22 Shouldn't this rule be generalized? Eg. sqlite will relatively soon
23 face a similar issue with SQLite4 and there are certainly more
24 examples.