1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 03/25/2011 11:04 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
5 |
> On 3/25/11 3:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
6 |
>> How about Gentoo Foundation funding devs a full blown X509 client |
7 |
>> certs? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Let's get signing and verifying working first, and then consider |
10 |
> anything that requires funding. |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
+1 |
14 |
|
15 |
We do not need to get paid for X509 certs. We control portage. We |
16 |
control the manifests. We do not need some third party CA to control the |
17 |
certs used for signing. We have the infrastructure to do it ourselves. |
18 |
For free. With us in control of the revocation etc. |
19 |
|
20 |
- -- |
21 |
Dane Smith (c1pher) |
22 |
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86 |
23 |
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531&op=index |
24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
25 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
26 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
27 |
|
28 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNjK7xAAoJEEsurZwMLhUxfCMP+gNozbZ7aVFl3xejgDOoAych |
29 |
ttvHp0bDHhIzBd+hO+GvQm6RSm/keHaBi3hX6Sv0IoxK3VARK4xZ7QHrgk2xEr1V |
30 |
4+vIv44NBpEKbmF5ilm/hWReq1CXpRnef5aL+mdlfGY3FvCVrJjeaMEu15I/TwkJ |
31 |
wD0fqYSZxZsHLoH0UCnCEew5MJlL8oT21vOVwXbSdZJ2YlpHoAjgR6AOmOTPl+pJ |
32 |
2ZHnQ7H+tuQr8PxH50rEba6MyrEG0Djgg8NI+w0dNgZcrWm2ODA6o6pdmh+yXlS4 |
33 |
PzvSbwDXe4K6E5i3LHjVAd4OFWS2SY6mLNrBHYR0cI0D0ZtMY3Tab3MksIvuPFaY |
34 |
X8WwZq5+oEXZgr2poeaKHl9FIoPTqa7eFQkQA3oOPGVb2T3vwpY4JinPvj4Eb5VN |
35 |
Yd/GnJonbuWtUx6+98b0rBmjhu51vjh7T7BTThKJbuBIJ5KH9NynOAHWpTk6ZyBf |
36 |
IIMoiEbL/zIr6ZJlIlBP5RlMOHrE2rP+e6D4mzmDOvVT4lIRhr25eCsh3k+K6lJ3 |
37 |
bbuYCCEaowmyMe/oEwrDPzuAdG+N3v4qjB7IvGebSKfv8PSqIBxOOiejAkeFKHFP |
38 |
Z+2xE65eaAHrr3F2sp+FwhWF9SQy4AAP+wjt1NLrdJGAHasvpn3Dp8rQ9eJq0XFJ |
39 |
HaUJZLyeEjWwe8md+jF4 |
40 |
=0aS+ |
41 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |