| 1 |
On 08/02/2011 11:05 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
>>> Please don't. |
| 3 |
>> > |
| 4 |
>> > Why would this be bad? |
| 5 |
> Because going behind the package mangler's back results in horribly |
| 6 |
> screwed up systems (as anyone who's ever used lafilefixer will tell |
| 7 |
> you...). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Is rlpkg going behind the PM's back when it does selinux labelings? I |
| 10 |
know there are difference, but if there's a screwup in some policy, it |
| 11 |
also leads to horribly screwed up system. Nonetheless, I'm not |
| 12 |
insensitive to what you are saying, and I think the safer approach would |
| 13 |
be to write a howto and show the user how to manually convert some |
| 14 |
typical binaries. There are only a handful that would be targeted. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 19 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 20 |
GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535 |
| 21 |
GnuPG ID : D0455535 |
Archives