| 1 |
On Wed, 07 May 2008 16:23:12 +0300 |
| 2 |
Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hello, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Over the course of this year, a lzma-utils buildtime dependency has |
| 7 |
> been added to a few system packages, to handle .tar.lzma tarballs. |
| 8 |
> This has huge implications on the requirement of the system toolchain, |
| 9 |
> which is highly disturbing from a minimal (lets say embedded) systems |
| 10 |
> concern - lzma-utils depends on the C++ compiler and the libstdc++ |
| 11 |
> beast, while a minimal system would like to avoid this at all cost. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The new lzma-utils codebase uses liblzma, written in C. It's at the |
| 14 |
alpha stage but supposedly supports encoding/decoding the current lzma |
| 15 |
format "well enough" (;P). It probably has some fun bugs to find |
| 16 |
and squish. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
http://sf.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=200804251652.58484.lasse.collin%40tukaani.org&forum_name=lzmautils-announce |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
fonts, gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
| 22 |
mips, treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
| 23 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives