1 |
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 13:51, Rainer Groesslinger wrote: |
2 |
> This may indeed be a better solution but my plan was not to remove |
3 |
> server support from the binary but just all the stuff specifically added |
4 |
> by the ebuild, so someone could still run a server with his custom |
5 |
> settings (and people already running a server won't need that stuff), |
6 |
> but for all people except those who run a cvs pserver _and_ use the |
7 |
> config supplied by the ebuild (including a new uid/gid etc.) it would |
8 |
> just be a burden. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> The benefit of disabling server things in the binary is virtually zero |
11 |
> IMHO, my point is about keeping the system more leightweight, so we |
12 |
> don't force the user to have all that stuff. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> That bug you mentioned perhaps has a far bigger impact and may still |
15 |
> need to have some things worked out, that's why I'd still like to have a |
16 |
> cvspserver local use flag, at least temporary (if another [better] |
17 |
> solution pops in later). |
18 |
> |
19 |
> It's not that I want to add the local flag by all means, personally I'd |
20 |
> just say "it would be better". |
21 |
|
22 |
Actually, I just thought of another solution. You could simply move all |
23 |
of the enewuser stuff to a pkg_config section and add a blurb to the |
24 |
pkg_postinst that says something along the lines of: "If you're wanting |
25 |
to run a cvs pserver, please run a /usr/sbin/ebuild /path/to/ebuild |
26 |
config." |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Chris Gianelloni |
30 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
31 |
Games Team |
32 |
|
33 |
Is your power animal a pengiun? |