1 |
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:13:56 +0000 |
2 |
Carlos Silva <r3pek@×××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
5 |
> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > It it isn't necessary for a system to have support for either |
8 |
> > oldnet or newnet. Sure, it is rare these days, but networking |
9 |
> > support should be a default, not a requirement. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Care to explain how will the installation be done if "networking" |
12 |
> isn't requirement? Maybe I missed the news about gentoo being and |
13 |
> offline-instalable :X |
14 |
|
15 |
Rich isn't talking about the installation, which should not change; |
16 |
it's just a hypothetical thought. But you can deduce it anyway: |
17 |
|
18 |
For the installation, "networking support should be a default". |
19 |
|
20 |
If you don't want networking support, you're on your own to find |
21 |
methods that allow you to offline installations and implement them; the |
22 |
way the Portage tree works is that you will need all the distfiles in |
23 |
place to be able to do an offline installatation, that can be tricky. |
24 |
The stage4 method mentioned in another reply is one possible approach. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
With kind regards, |
28 |
|
29 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
30 |
Gentoo Developer |
31 |
|
32 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
33 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
34 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |