Archives
Archives
| From: | Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr/libexec vs /usr/lib(32|64)/misc | ||
| Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:41:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20051129164120.51c712bd@eusebe | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr/libexec vs /usr/lib(32|64)/misc by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:27:10 +0000 |
| 2 | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > i know they are executables, that's why we're talking about a |
| 5 | > specific subdir of lib |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > libexec clutters /usr while /usr/lib/misc hides it nicely ... |
| 8 | > afterall, this are internal binaries that end user should never |
| 9 | > run themselves |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Random thought of the day: why not /usr/bin/misc? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | TGL. |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr/libexec vs /usr/lib(32|64)/misc | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |