| 1 |
Foser, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Thanks for the informative write-up on what has happened with |
| 4 |
gst-plugins lately. It's nice to see that kind of thing happening on |
| 5 |
this list. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
foser wrote: [Thu Sep 25 2003, 02:17:50PM EDT] |
| 8 |
> Leaves us with option (3), my preferred choice. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I like (3) best also. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Also we could add a series of USE-flagged |
| 13 |
> dependencies to the gst-plugins package, where known working and stable |
| 14 |
> plug-ins get installed providing a solid basis for a lot of |
| 15 |
> applications. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
IMHO, this is perfectly sufficient mitigation for the disadvantages of |
| 18 |
(3). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> Any suggestions/improvements/questions ? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I don't have any suggestions. Looks like you've done a complete |
| 23 |
analysis and arrived at well-reasoned conclusions. Nice work. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Aron |
Archives