Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: qt.eclass
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:04:13
Message-Id: 20050630220142.6727a825@eusebe
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: qt.eclass by Caleb Tennis
1 On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:33:04 -0500
2 Caleb Tennis <caleb@g.o> wrote:
3
4 >
5 > $(qt_min_version 3.3) == "|| ( =x11-libs/qt-3.3.3
6 > =x11-libs/qt-3.3.3-r1 =x11-libs/qt-3.3.3-r2
7 > =x11-libs/qt-3.3.3-r3 =x11-libs/qt-3.3.4 )
8 >
9
10 It seems that portage evaluates disjonction left to right and
11 stops on the first match it founds. Thus, if you want want it to
12 choose the best matching version, you should rather sort them in
13 decreasing order. (At least, that's what a small test with CVS
14 HEAD shows here.)
15
16 --
17 TGL.
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: qt.eclass Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: qt.eclass Caleb Tennis <caleb@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: qt.eclass Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>