| 1 |
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:18:54 -0600 |
| 2 |
Steve Dibb <beandog@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I don't mind the qt3/qt4 flags for packages that support both, but |
| 6 |
> > could we also have a qt flag that selects the "preferred" version |
| 7 |
> > (or for packages that only support one)? Many people simply don't |
| 8 |
> > care about the version but also don't need support for both in |
| 9 |
> > every package, also that makes transition easier IMHO. |
| 10 |
> > Though that creates a problem when both the unversioned and one of |
| 11 |
> > the versioned flags are used, not sure how to deal with that. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> That gives me an idea, and if this has been suggested before, just |
| 14 |
> ignore me -- I'm new here. :) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> What about having a variable in make.conf, something like |
| 17 |
> USE_QT_VERSIONS, where you could put the preferred Qt versions that |
| 18 |
> you'd like support built for? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
That would require quite a bit of effort for a single special case, |
| 21 |
depending how exactly you want to implement it it's likely gonna screw |
| 22 |
up with the cache as well, so not really an option. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Marius |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 30 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives