1 |
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 20:17 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote: |
2 |
> Now look at the LKML. It's often hard to find general discussion behind |
3 |
> the truckloads of patches and river of technical review emails. A large |
4 |
> proportion of the content is not "understandable" unless you have a good |
5 |
> knowledge of C, operating systems, and the technical area in question. |
6 |
> This isn't a place that users hang out, users dont really read it |
7 |
> either, and you need to be a decent developer to get involved in the |
8 |
> first place. |
9 |
|
10 |
This is honestly one of the things I think is a problem with this list, |
11 |
in particular. I hope to start trying to steer the "conversation" away |
12 |
from this list and keep things on a more technical level. If things |
13 |
start to go off-topic, you might likely get a response from me asking |
14 |
you to either get back on-topic or to take it elsewhere. Looking back |
15 |
over the flames we've seen recently, there's usually very little |
16 |
technical discussion, if any. Instead it is heated argument over things |
17 |
like beliefs (technical or otherwise) and politics, neither of which |
18 |
really belong on a development list. I think if this list got back to |
19 |
its core of being a *development* list, that many of the flames would |
20 |
die down to an acceptable level. |
21 |
|
22 |
Thank you for your insight, Daniel! |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Chris Gianelloni |
26 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
27 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
28 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
29 |
Gentoo Foundation |