Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thierry Carrez <koon@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Heimdal in danger of being security masked
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:51:09
Message-Id: 4148810A.1050706@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Heimdal in danger of being security masked by Carsten Lohrke
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Carsten Lohrke wrote:
5 > On Wednesday 15 September 2004 18:53, Aron Griffis wrote:
6 >
7 >>There's another problem with heimdal: it presently conflicts with
8 >>mit-krb5. See bug 47138
9 >
10 > I guess this a problem of the past. Both packages provide virtual/krb5
11 and
12 > block each other this way.
13
14 Rule is : if it works at least as well as the current stable version,
15 then the security-fix version should be marked stable.
16
17 Security stable marking is not the right moment to fix all pending bugs
18 on a package. Only regressions should prevent a package from getting a
19 security stable keyword.
20
21 - --
22 Koon
23 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
24 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
25 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
26
27 iD8DBQFBSIEKvcL1obalX08RAnq6AJ427ehOy7Md92Cyhug5FLeKjONmjgCcCYGg
28 lMuKCYgKP8OQ3nmARFUdef0=
29 =sOgi
30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
31
32 --
33 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list