Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS

[Jakub Moc]

Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 09:39:28PM -0600, R Hill wrote:
>> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> R Hill wrote:
>>>> There's an endless number of CFLAGS that could be warned about, and just
>>>> as many situations where they're actually useful.  Aside, I've yet to
>>>> hear of _anything_ that's broken because of -fvisibility-inlines-hidden.
>>>> (course someone will undoubtedly point one out now ;))
>>> How about kde?
>> Close, that's -fvisibility=hidden. :)
>>
>>   http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/changes.html#visibility
>>
>> --de.
>
> kdevelop used to not compile with -fvisibility-inlines-hidden, not sure
> if that's changed now.

Sure enough it's changed - kde.eclass now filters all this visibility
crap (-fvisibility=hidden *and* -fvisibility-inlines-hidden) by default
because it bombs out really badly... :)

http://groups.google.de/group/linux.gentoo.dev/browse_frm/thread/f43fac917352bb51/5093e84871f08de6?lnk=st

More fun:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109386
http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/flameeyes/2005/11/16/happy_the_visibility_stuff_goes_away
http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/flameeyes/2005/10/06/ehi_i_m_invisible


-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:jakub@g.o
 GPG signature:
 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature   ;)