1 |
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:08:23PM -0500, Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Yeah, see, this is a case where not understanding the structure of |
8 |
> > Gentoo gives you the wrong impression. The GDP's policy applies to the |
9 |
> > GDP. That is not a global developer policy of any kind. It is a policy |
10 |
> > by a project, for that project. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > If I were, for example, to write up a nice guide for something on the |
13 |
> > games team and do it all in ASCII art, that policy has no bearing on |
14 |
> > what I do. If I were to write something for the GDP, then it would. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > At any rate, that has *zero* bearing on whether or not our update |
17 |
> > information needs to be written in GuideXML, so there's no point in |
18 |
> > arguing it with you. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> |
21 |
> So you're saying that Gentoo consists of projects that are completely |
22 |
> 'silo'd up' and have no bearing whatsoever on each other. Then the |
23 |
> DevRel project only has bearing on those who actually join DevRel. Neat, |
24 |
> a group formed for the sole purpose of coordinating itself. Security |
25 |
> need only concern itself with securing its members (from who knows |
26 |
> what!), and infra can just ignore the needs of everyone else (different |
27 |
> project!). I wonder how any of the other projects *ever* made it onto |
28 |
> the website... |
29 |
|
30 |
No, he's saying you're talking out of your behind. And you continue to |
31 |
do so |
32 |
|
33 |
Gentoo projects have their own areas of responsibility, the GDP's area |
34 |
of responsibility is the GDP, devrel's area of responsibility is |
35 |
developers, infra's area of responsibility is infrastructure. |
36 |
|
37 |
Thank you, come again |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Jon Portnoy |
41 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |