Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@×××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] request for comments: move to stable
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 23:20:27
Message-Id: 200307170020.20106.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] request for comments: move to stable by Peter Ruskin
1 On Wednesday 16 Jul 2003 15:19, Peter Ruskin wrote:
2 > On Wednesday 16 Jul 2003 14:50, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
3 > > Hi All,
4 > >
5 > > We'd like to receive comments (the negative ones, especially) for
6 > > moving gcc-3.2.3-r1, glibc-2.3.2-r1 and binutils-2.14.90.0.2 from
7 > > ~arch to arch (at least for x86 platform).
8 > >
9 > > Thanks,
10 >
11 > Will the others work if I stick with glibc-2.3.1? I use winex and it
12 > won't work with 2.3.2.
13 >
14 Now that I know that winex *will* work with NPTL, I'll still stick with
15 glibc-2.3.1, because NPTL needs >2.5.45 kernel and I can't use Win4Lin
16 with anything but a few current kernels.
17
18 Sorry for being a stick-in-the-mud but I'm comfortable with running
19 Gentoo and winex and Win4Lin. So if gcc-3.2.3-r1 and
20 binutils-2.14.90.0.2 can't co-exist with glibc-2.3.1 I'll have to add
21 them to /etc/portage/profiles/package.mask.
22
23 Peter
24 --
25 ==================================================
26 Gentoo Linux: Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.8p1
27 kernel-2.4.22_pre2-gss i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+
28 ==================================================
29
30
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] request for comments: move to stable Brad Laue <brad@g.o>