Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:58:26
Message-Id: f76f0u$9hc$1@sea.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes by Markus Ullmann
1 Markus Ullmann wrote:
2
3 > Hey ;)
4 >
5 > As an extension of it. What about this:
6 >
7 > _All_ posts from -dev go in CC to -project. Even if the posts are
8 > moderated, they always appear there. That way you can have a (moderated)
9 > subset as -dev and people who want to get their words and fights out,
10 > can do that on -project?
11 >
12 Sounds good. But your devs are not the people to moderate. Nor is devrel
13 based on what kloeri told me about it.
14
15 If you want users and devs in a forum which is moderated, then the
16 moderators *have* to have authority over _both_ and more importantly a
17 mandate. This has all been discussed before, it's what lead to the CoC
18 (which arguably wasn't needed) and the proctors (who definitely were and
19 still are.) *Face it guys*, you made a mistake in getting rid of them.
20
21 Running around trying to get more toys isn't going to change that, and all
22 you're doing now is wasting the last year's work on the non-technical
23 aspects of development, and potentially digging a much bigger, much nastier
24 hole.
25
26
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list